Halbritter H Weber M Zetter R Froschradivo A Buchner R Hesse M 2008 Pal Dat Illustrated Handbook

on Pollen Terminology. http://www. 61.

paldaf.org/, Wien

52. HARLEY MM (1999) Tetrad variation: 62. its influence on pollen form and syste-

matics in the Palmae. In: Kurmann MH, Hemsley AR (eds) The Evolution of Plant 63. Architecture. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 289-304 64.

53. HARLEY MM (2004) Triaperturate pollen in the monocotyledons: configuration and conjecture. Pl Syst Evol 247:

75-122 65.

54. HARLEY MM, FERGUSON IK (1990) The role of the SEM in pollen morphology and plant systematics. In: Claugher D 66. (ed) Scanning Electron Microscopy in Taxonomy and Functional Morphology. Syst Ass Special Volume 41: 45-68. 67. Clarendon Press, Oxford

55. HARRIS WF (1955) A manual of the spores of New Zealand Pteridophyta. A discussion of spore morphology and dispersal with reference to the identifi- 68. cation of the spores in surface samples and as microfossils. New Zealand Dept

Government Printer, Wellington.

56. HAY WW, SANDBERG PA (1967) The Scanning Electron Microscope, a major break-through for micropaleon-tology. Micropaleontology 13: 407-418

57. HESLOP-HARRISON J, HESLOP- 70. HARRISON Y (1980) Cytochemistry and function of the Zwischenk├Ârper in grass pollens. Pollen Spores 22: 5-10

Was this article helpful?

0 0

Post a comment